论文已发表
提 交 论 文
注册即可获取Ebpay生命的最新动态
注 册
IF 收录期刊
肝硬化所致食管胃底静脉曲张患者在协同护理模式下自我管理干预方案的开发与实施
Authors Li M, Xie XE , Qin X, Wu T, Bian ZL
Received 23 December 2024
Accepted for publication 7 May 2025
Published 22 May 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 2673—2686
DOI http://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S514019
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Xudong Zhu
Ming Li,1,2 Xing-Er Xie,3 Xiangqing Qin,2 Tian Wu,2 Zhao-Lian Bian2
1School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong University, Nantong, 226000, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Gastroenterology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226000, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Nursing, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226000, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Xing-Er Xie, Email ardf411@163.com
Objective: To design and evaluate a self-management intervention program tailored for patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for esophageal and gastric varices secondary to liver cirrhosis, implemented within a collaborative care framework.
Methods: The control group received standard inpatient care and discharge instructions, whereas the intervention group participated in the newly developed collaborative care program. Key outcomes, including self-management proficiency, medication adherence, quality of life, rebleeding rates, and unplanned readmissions within a three-month period, were compared between the two groups. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on disease severity using Child-Pugh scores.
Results: The intervention group demonstrated significantly higher scores in self-management proficiency compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Medication adherence was markedly better in the intervention group (P < 0.05), with a 95% adherence rate versus 76.92% in the control group. Quality of life assessments also revealed superior scores in the intervention group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the intervention group had significantly lower rates of unplanned readmissions (5.00% vs 20.51%, P < 0.05) and rebleeding (10.00% vs 30.77%, P < 0.05) compared to the control group. The 12-month survival rate was significantly higher in the intervention group (95.00% vs 79.49%, P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses indicated that patients with more advanced disease benefited the most from the intervention.
Conclusion: The implementation of a self-management intervention program within a collaborative care framework significantly enhances self-management capabilities, medication adherence, and quality of life while reducing rebleeding rates, unplanned readmissions, and mortality in patients with esophageal and gastric varices secondary to liver cirrhosis. These findings underscore the importance of tailored self-management strategies, particularly for patients with advanced disease, and highlight the potential of collaborative care to address the complex needs of this population. This study provides a strong foundation for future research to optimize and scale similar interventions in diverse clinical settings.
Keywords: Endoscopic treatment, esophageal and gastric varices, liver cirrhosis, self-management, collaborative care, intervention